E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672

2016, Vol:6,Issue:3

Research Articles
  • Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol.2016; Volume:6(3):209-214 doi : 10.5455/njppp.2016.6.28012016115
  • Effect of topical sodium fusidate, calcium mupirocin and papain - urea on wound healing in diabetic wistar rats
  • Smita Shenoy , Raghu Murthy , Lalit Mohan , Amoolya Gowda , Venu Madhav Nelluri

Abstract

Background: Poor wound healing is a complication of diabetes mellitus. Various agents have been used to promote wound healingindiabeticpatients.Papainureaisusedasasloughingagent,whereassodiumfusidateandcalciummupirocinareused as topical antimicrobials for wounds in diabetics. Aims and
Objective: To evaluate effect of topical sodium fusidate, calcium mupirocin, and papain–urea on wound healing in diabetic wistar rats.
Materials and Methods: Incision and excision wound models were used. Each model hadfive groups of six rats each and one group was nondiabetic control. Diabetes was induced in the remaining four groups, one diabetic control, and three test groups in each model, using streptozotocin (30 mg/kg intraperitoneally). Wounds were made in diabetic rats with blood glucose levels of more than 250 mg/dL. Paraffin ointment base was applied to wounds of nondiabetic and diabetic control, whereas sodium fusidate, mupirocin, and papain–urea were applied topically to three test groups, respectively, in each model. Result: In sodium fusidate-treated group, there was a significantincreaseinbreakingstrengthofincisionwound,contractionrate,andhydroxyprolinecontentofexcision woundas comparedtodiabeticcontrolgroup.Therewassignificantdecreaseinperiodofepithelizationinsodiumfusidate-treatedgroup compared to diabetic control group. There was no significant alteration in wound healing by mupirocin and papain–urea. Conclusion: Topical application of sodium fusidate promoted wound healing in diabetic rats.